a70c2518af
answer to clarification.
2010-04-16 18:16:47 +02:00
49be30eae8
clarify re %pagestate persistence
2010-04-16 12:08:12 -04:00
18b39ff975
try to clarify
2010-04-16 15:31:31 +00:00
e26ac520bf
typo
2010-04-16 17:21:54 +02:00
5c263623c2
answer about the `%pagestate` of autopages.
2010-04-16 17:19:44 +02:00
208a77a977
response
2010-04-16 03:41:25 +00:00
b5e7f7a67f
slight clarification
2010-04-15 23:39:02 +00:00
f0ed76441d
some comments about this and autoindex
2010-04-15 23:36:42 +00:00
55d4e6bdce
Reply to KA about collapsing metadata functionality
2010-04-15 13:54:54 +00:00
19700c70e5
response, alternative proposal
2010-04-15 07:39:32 +00:00
2f6da5fd2b
Describe my tag type proposal
2010-04-15 07:19:47 +00:00
43ed0cd07e
note link types are now available
2010-04-14 16:04:52 -04:00
aaaef74010
update
2010-04-12 16:46:38 -04:00
24fb346938
fix bug
2010-04-12 16:04:49 -04:00
df022df35e
implemented the other half of this
...
Writing my own sort code actually was faster than the built in sort. Whee!
(That's not supposed to happen, is it. ;)
But, I need to make sure influences are calculated alright.
2010-04-12 15:02:18 -04:00
0bfc364a7d
optimization: pagespec_match_list with no num limit matches before sorting
...
This can be a lot faster, since huge numbers of pages are not sorted
only to mostly be thrown away. It sped up a build of my blog by at least
5 minutes.
2010-04-11 01:30:03 -04:00
cecbd52938
plan for more efficient pagespec_match_list sorting
...
(smcv please note)
2010-04-11 00:30:27 -04:00
a8761a086e
2010-04-10 07:06:06 +00:00
c127e964f1
expand my response
2010-04-07 21:25:26 +01:00
32ce94f5a3
close (but one question remains!)
2010-04-06 23:30:10 -04:00
dad7ac5a21
question
2010-04-06 23:24:22 -04:00
fcd810d236
close
2010-04-06 23:04:54 -04:00
811d398646
response
2010-04-06 23:20:49 +00:00
899639f10d
fixed
2010-04-06 20:03:26 +00:00
407a349359
nearly there!
2010-04-06 14:20:44 -04:00
c87ddb6908
idea
2010-04-06 13:58:55 -04:00
ee1e7079eb
more flexible underlays, please?
2010-04-06 04:41:55 +00:00
1fb5b9f61c
switch branch for review to use ready/foo convention
2010-04-06 00:04:47 +00:00
b186ec1b4c
ready for review, I think
2010-04-06 00:02:18 +00:00
10f4695abd
response
2010-04-05 15:28:54 -04:00
861080b918
potential performance improvements
2010-04-05 19:19:00 +00:00
b51703569d
speed
2010-04-05 14:59:29 -04:00
61a31a3d63
updated branch
2010-04-04 00:34:36 +00:00
129bea3177
answer about autofiles for tags
2010-04-03 23:42:35 +02:00
36202d461f
link to commits
2010-04-03 23:42:35 +02:00
56c64ff196
updated branch
2010-04-03 13:39:44 +00:00
931c7b00cc
response
2010-04-02 22:46:31 -04:00
e4e53d7a18
response
2010-04-02 22:23:36 -04:00
5445fe7657
cross-reference
2010-04-03 01:15:28 +00:00
3934759592
vague musings about wikilinks
2010-04-03 01:13:08 +00:00
c4a838b33a
perhaps the typedlink(tag foo) pagespec isn't so useful
2010-04-03 00:53:59 +00:00
c2f54ccfb7
sort-order could usefully be overridden for meta author, too
2010-04-03 00:41:31 +00:00
5f87d5d242
actually I can see a second use for "nonlinear" syntax - but I don't think it's worth it
2010-04-03 00:25:28 +00:00
aec7dec279
make questions to Joey more explicit
2010-04-03 00:12:59 +00:00
011fe920d1
respond at some length
2010-04-03 00:00:53 +00:00
2c7fe7ae2c
respond (also unindent Joey's review to avoid very deep indentation)
2010-04-02 22:25:16 +00:00
1faf9b08e1
idea
2010-04-02 17:37:38 -04:00
9e7dcefd7e
comments
2010-04-02 17:26:32 -04:00
1b0d4e8d88
minor comment
2010-04-02 17:16:12 -04:00
de62ea1cc8
fix branch name
2010-04-02 17:03:33 -04:00
David Riebenbauer
Joey Hess
http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/
http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/
http://oblomov.myopenid.com/
Cord
Jon Dowland