urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

make questions to Joey more explicit

master
http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ 2010-04-03 00:12:59 +00:00 committed by Joey Hess
parent 011fe920d1
commit aec7dec279
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
View File

@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>> introducing "sort spec" in the API. I took a cue from
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec/sorting]] being a subpage of
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec]], and decided that yes, sorting is
>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) --s
>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) Which name would you prefer? --s
>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff.
>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff. --J
>>>>> It basically exists to support `title_natural`, to avoid
>>>>> firing up the whole import mechanism on every `cmp`
@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>>
>>>>> The former function could be achieved at a small
>>>>> compatibility cost by putting `title_natural` in a new
>>>>> sortnatural plugin (that fails to load if you don't
>>>>> `sortnatural` plugin (that fails to load if you don't
>>>>> have `title_natural`), if you'd prefer - that's what would
>>>>> have happened if `title_natural` was written after this
>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. --s
>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. Would you prefer this? --s
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to have `meta(title)` instead
>>>> of `meta_title`? --J
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>> "ascending age" both seem useful to be able to explicitly specify.
>>>> --[[Joey]]
>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathyrnAndersen]]'s syntax
>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathrynAndersen]]'s syntax
>>>>> from [[plugins/contrib/report]] (which I copied verbatim, except for
>>>>> turning sort-by-`field` into a parameterized spec), and I can't really
>>>>> think of any sensible way to combine sort specs other than "sort by a,
@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>> voltage, with more or less recently updated pages being said to have
>>>>> more or less updateage. I don't know whether that's good or bad :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. --s
>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. Do you have
>>>>> a better idea? --s
## Documentation from sort-package branch