pagetitle_function_does_not_respect_meta_titles: proposal
parent
f632cb2f8f
commit
b42195625c
|
@ -231,3 +231,44 @@ So, looking at your meta branch: --[[Joey]]
|
|||
>> handling, since po contains a workaround for that, and it's probably
|
||||
>> acceptable to use potentially slow methods to handle this case.)
|
||||
>> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>> I'm glad to implement whatever decision we'll make, but I don't
|
||||
>>> clearly understand what this discussion's conclusion is. It seems
|
||||
>>> like we agree at least on one point: meta page titles shall not be
|
||||
>>> displayed all over the place by default; I have therefore disabled
|
||||
>>> `meta_overrides_page_title` by default in my `meta` branch.
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> My next question is then: do we only want to satisfy the `po`
|
||||
>>> plugin needs? Or do we want to allow people who want this, such as
|
||||
>>> [[madduck]], to turn on a config switch so that meta page titles
|
||||
>>> are displayed as wikilinks titles? In the latter case, what level
|
||||
>>> of configurability do we want? I can think of a quite inelegant
|
||||
>>> way to implement full configurability, and provide a configuration
|
||||
>>> switch for every place where links are displayed, such as
|
||||
>>> wikilinks, parentlinks, etc., but I don't think the added bonus is
|
||||
>>> worth the complexity of it.
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> I think we can roughly split the needs into three categories:
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> 1. never display any modified page title in links; this is the
|
||||
>>> current behaviour, and we should keep it as the default one
|
||||
>>> 2. display modified page titles only at well chosen places; that
|
||||
>>> could be "manual" wikilinks, I mean those generated by the
|
||||
>>> `link`, `camelcase` & al. plugins, the recentchanges page, and
|
||||
>>> maybe a few other places; keep the usual pagename-based title
|
||||
>>> for every other link, such as the parentlinks ones.
|
||||
>>> The inter-page dependency problem remains, though. As a first
|
||||
>>> step, I'm in favour of the "slow, but correct" implementation,
|
||||
>>> with a big warning stating that enabling this option can make
|
||||
>>> a wiki really sluggish; if someone really wants this to work
|
||||
>>> fast, he/she'll implement a clever dependency handler :)
|
||||
>>> 3. display modified page titles all over the place; IMHO, we
|
||||
>>> should implement only the bits needed so that the `po` plugin
|
||||
>>> can set this up, rather than provide this as
|
||||
>>> a user-configurable option.
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> So my question is: do we want to implement the #2 case, or not?
|
||||
>>> I propose myself to only implement #1 and #3 to start with, but do
|
||||
>>> it in a way that leaves room for #2.
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> --[[intrigeri]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue