make questions to Joey more explicit
parent
011fe920d1
commit
aec7dec279
|
@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
|
||||||
>>>>> introducing "sort spec" in the API. I took a cue from
|
>>>>> introducing "sort spec" in the API. I took a cue from
|
||||||
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec/sorting]] being a subpage of
|
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec/sorting]] being a subpage of
|
||||||
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec]], and decided that yes, sorting is
|
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec]], and decided that yes, sorting is
|
||||||
>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) --s
|
>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) Which name would you prefer? --s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff.
|
>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff. --J
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>>>> It basically exists to support `title_natural`, to avoid
|
>>>>> It basically exists to support `title_natural`, to avoid
|
||||||
>>>>> firing up the whole import mechanism on every `cmp`
|
>>>>> firing up the whole import mechanism on every `cmp`
|
||||||
|
@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
|
||||||
>>>>>
|
>>>>>
|
||||||
>>>>> The former function could be achieved at a small
|
>>>>> The former function could be achieved at a small
|
||||||
>>>>> compatibility cost by putting `title_natural` in a new
|
>>>>> compatibility cost by putting `title_natural` in a new
|
||||||
>>>>> sortnatural plugin (that fails to load if you don't
|
>>>>> `sortnatural` plugin (that fails to load if you don't
|
||||||
>>>>> have `title_natural`), if you'd prefer - that's what would
|
>>>>> have `title_natural`), if you'd prefer - that's what would
|
||||||
>>>>> have happened if `title_natural` was written after this
|
>>>>> have happened if `title_natural` was written after this
|
||||||
>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. --s
|
>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. Would you prefer this? --s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to have `meta(title)` instead
|
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to have `meta(title)` instead
|
||||||
>>>> of `meta_title`? --J
|
>>>> of `meta_title`? --J
|
||||||
|
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
|
||||||
>>>> "ascending age" both seem useful to be able to explicitly specify.
|
>>>> "ascending age" both seem useful to be able to explicitly specify.
|
||||||
>>>> --[[Joey]]
|
>>>> --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathyrnAndersen]]'s syntax
|
>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathrynAndersen]]'s syntax
|
||||||
>>>>> from [[plugins/contrib/report]] (which I copied verbatim, except for
|
>>>>> from [[plugins/contrib/report]] (which I copied verbatim, except for
|
||||||
>>>>> turning sort-by-`field` into a parameterized spec), and I can't really
|
>>>>> turning sort-by-`field` into a parameterized spec), and I can't really
|
||||||
>>>>> think of any sensible way to combine sort specs other than "sort by a,
|
>>>>> think of any sensible way to combine sort specs other than "sort by a,
|
||||||
|
@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
|
||||||
>>>>> voltage, with more or less recently updated pages being said to have
|
>>>>> voltage, with more or less recently updated pages being said to have
|
||||||
>>>>> more or less updateage. I don't know whether that's good or bad :-)
|
>>>>> more or less updateage. I don't know whether that's good or bad :-)
|
||||||
>>>>>
|
>>>>>
|
||||||
>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. --s
|
>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. Do you have
|
||||||
|
>>>>> a better idea? --s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Documentation from sort-package branch
|
## Documentation from sort-package branch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue