[Docs] Wording & formatting changes in the Tapping Force Hold section of the Tap Hold page + removed trailing whitespaces (#10391)

* Wording & formatting changes in Tapping Force Hold

The Permissive Hold and the Ignore Mod Tap Interrupt sections were also modified to remove the quotes
around "tapping".

* Removed all trailing whitespaces from tap hold doc

* "it's simply really:" → "it's simple really:"

* "This allows to keep the ability" → "This allows keeping the ability"

Used the gerund form of "to keep" in the Tapping Force Hold section of the Tap Hold docs.

Co-authored-by: ridingqwerty <george.g.koenig@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: ridingqwerty <george.g.koenig@gmail.com>
master
precondition 2020-09-26 23:11:40 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent c16ee22784
commit 28ff51175b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ As of [PR#1359](https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/pull/1359/), there is a new
This makes tap and hold keys (like Mod Tap) work better for fast typists, or for high `TAPPING_TERM` settings.
If you press a Mod Tap key, tap another key (press and release) and then release the Mod Tap key, all within the tapping term, it will output the "tapping" function for both keys.
If you press a Mod Tap key, tap another key (press and release) and then release the Mod Tap key, all within the tapping term, it will output the tapping function for both keys.
For Instance:
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ To enable this setting, add this to your `config.h`:
#define IGNORE_MOD_TAP_INTERRUPT
```
Similar to Permissive Hold, this alters how the firmware processes inputs for fast typists. If you press a Mod Tap key, press another key, release the Mod Tap key, and then release the normal key, it would normally output the "tapping" function for both keys. This may not be desirable for rolling combo keys.
Similar to Permissive Hold, this alters how the firmware processes inputs for fast typists. If you press a Mod Tap key, press another key, release the Mod Tap key, and then release the normal key, it would normally output the tapping function for both keys. This may not be desirable for rolling combo keys.
Setting `Ignore Mod Tap Interrupt` requires holding both keys for the `TAPPING_TERM` to trigger the hold function (the mod).
@ -132,21 +132,21 @@ To enable `tapping force hold`, add the following to your `config.h`:
#define TAPPING_FORCE_HOLD
```
When the user holds a key after tap, this repeats the tapped key rather to hold a modifier key. This allows to use auto repeat for the tapped key.
When the user holds a key after tapping it, the tapping function is repeated by default, rather than activating the hold function. This allows keeping the ability to auto-repeat the tapping function of a dual-role key. `TAPPING_FORCE_HOLD` removes that ability to let the user activate the hold function instead, in the case of holding the dual-role key after having tapped it.
Example:
- SFT_T(KC_A) Down
- SFT_T(KC_A) Up
- SFT_T(KC_A) Down
- wait more than tapping term...
- SFT_T(KC_A) Up
- `SFT_T(KC_A)` Down
- `SFT_T(KC_A)` Up
- `SFT_T(KC_A)` Down
- wait until the tapping term expires...
- `SFT_T(KC_A)` Up
With default settings, `a` will be sent on the first release, then `a` will be sent on the second press allowing the computer to trigger its auto repeat function.
With `TAPPING_FORCE_HOLD`, the second press will be interpreted as a Shift, allowing to use it as a modifier shortly after having used it as a tap.
!> `TAPPING_FORCE_HOLD` will break anything that uses tapping toggles (Such as the `TT` layer keycode, and the One Shot Tapping Toggle).
!> `TAPPING_FORCE_HOLD` will break anything that uses tapping toggles (Such as the `TT` layer keycode, and the One Shot Tap Toggle).
For more granular control of this feature, you can add the following to your `config.h`:
@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ For instance, holding and releasing `LT(2, KC_SPACE)` without hitting another ke
One thing that you may notice is that we include the key record for all of the "per key" functions, and may be wondering why we do that.
Well, it's simply really: customization. But specifically, it depends on how your keyboard is wired up. For instance, if each row is actually using a row in the keyboard's matrix, then it may be simpler to use `if (record->event.row == 3)` instead of checking a whole bunch of keycodes. Which is especially good for those people using the Tap Hold type keys on the home row. So you could fine tune those to not interfere with your normal typing.
Well, it's simple really: customization. But specifically, it depends on how your keyboard is wired up. For instance, if each row is actually using a row in the keyboard's matrix, then it may be simpler to use `if (record->event.row == 3)` instead of checking a whole bunch of keycodes. Which is especially good for those people using the Tap Hold type keys on the home row. So you could fine tune those to not interfere with your normal typing.
## Why is there no `*_kb` or `*_user` functions?!