ikiwiki/doc/forum/refresh_and_setup/comment_2_e2476f834f9bc8fe7...

57 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

[[!comment format=mdwn
username="smcv"
subject="comment 2"
date="2015-03-01T15:13:08Z"
content="""
> ikiwiki --setup $setupfile
>
> Didn't work as expected, rebuilt the whole wiki.
The default action is to rebuild if `--setup` is used, or refresh otherwise.
> ikiwiki -setup -refresh $setupfile
>
> Output was:
>
> cannot read -refresh: No such file or directory
Well, no, you told ikiwiki to use a setup file named `-refresh`. That's not
going to work, unless you happen to have such a file. The man page does say
> --setup setupfile
implying that an argument is expected and required. Either of these would be OK,
for instance:
ikiwiki -refresh -setup setupfile
ikiwiki --setup setupfile --refresh
> 2.a) It is the only place where *-setup* is used. the error output and the manpage use *--setup*
Perl's command-line parser accepts either.
> 3.) The file with the basic settings for the installation procedure is referred to as \"setup\" file. And so are the files with the settings for a particular wiki.
That's because the one used for the auto-installation (which is not mandatory: you can
write the entire setup file yourself if you prefer, like ikiwiki-hosting does) is a
special case of the one used for a configured wiki./
> And maybe it would be possible to update a wiki if the program is called with only a config file as parameter.
ikiwiki needs either:
* two non-option arguments, a srcdir *and* a destdir (and probably lots of other options
in practice); or
* a setup file (which can specify most things supported by the command line) and
no non-option arguments
Both ways are meant to work; the srcdir/destdir syntax is for very simple
cases (e.g. building static documentation) and the setup file is for
more complicated cases (entire websites).
Treating two non-option arguments as srcdir/destdir, but a single
non-option argument as a setup file, seems more confusing to me
than the current situation.
"""]]