55 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
The new internal page feature is designed for something like
|
|
[[plugins/aggregate]].
|
|
|
|
How to transition to it though? inlines of aggregated content would need to
|
|
change their pagespecs to use `internal()`.
|
|
|
|
> [[patch]] in git://git.debian.org/git/users/smcv/ikiwiki.git, branch "aggregate".
|
|
> Migration is a two-step process: first change all your pagespecs to use `internal()`, then add `internalize="yes"` to all your aggregate invocations. --smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk
|
|
|
|
> Thanks for working on this.
|
|
>
|
|
> I see one problem, if internalize is flipped on and there are existing
|
|
> aggregated pages, htmlfn will not return the right filename for those
|
|
> pages when expiring them. Seems that `$was_internal` (or just the full
|
|
> source filename) should be recorded on a per-guid basis. Could you do
|
|
> that?
|
|
>
|
|
> I'm weighing the added complexity of having an internalize option
|
|
> (which people would have to add, and would probably forget), with just
|
|
> making aggregate create all new pages as internal, and having a flag day
|
|
> where all inlines and other uses of aggregated pages have to change
|
|
> pagespecs to use `isinternal()`.
|
|
>
|
|
> There are real bugs that are fixed by making
|
|
> aggregated plugins internal, including:
|
|
> - Avoids web edits to aggregated pages. (Arguably a security hole;
|
|
> though they can be locked..)
|
|
> - Significant speed improvements.
|
|
> - Less disk use.
|
|
>
|
|
> If internal has to be manually enabled, people will forget to. I'd rather
|
|
> not have to worry about these bugs in the future. So, I'm thinking flag
|
|
> day. --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
> OK, there's a simpler approach in the same repository, branch
|
|
> "aggregateinternal". It just adds an aggregateinternal option
|
|
> for the whole wiki.
|
|
>
|
|
> On a flag day, everyone has to change their inline directives
|
|
> to use `internal()`, after which this option can be switched on.
|
|
> When changing the option, you'll have to clean up the mess from
|
|
> old aggregated pages by hand, and re-aggregate.
|
|
>
|
|
> If this is a direction you prefer, the next step would be to
|
|
> add support for existing wikis setting this option - for instance
|
|
> it could look for non-internal pages that were previously
|
|
> aggregated, and convert them to internal, the first time aggregation
|
|
> runs. --smcv
|
|
|
|
> Sure, that seems reasonable. Perhaps `ikiwiki-transition` could be used
|
|
> to move the pages, and even, possibly update the pagespecs (not sure how
|
|
> it could figure out which ones tho). --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
[[patch]]
|