28 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
(brief, sorry, via Phone. More details to follow)
|
|
|
|
I gradually splitting discussion pages into separate comment pages, containing a comment directive.
|
|
|
|
The "date" attribute is being set to the date output by gig for a commit. (I'd hope this was parseable)
|
|
|
|
The presentation of the resulting comments is not sorted by this date, which I would hope/expect, but instead by the ctime or mtime of the file at the other end, as best I can tell.
|
|
|
|
-- [[Jon]]
|
|
|
|
> Yes, comments are displayed via an inline, and usual [[pagespec/sorting]]
|
|
> (eg, default of when the file was first seen) is used. The comment
|
|
> date only affects the date displayed.
|
|
>
|
|
> The only time I've seen this be much problem personally is when moving
|
|
> a page, which means moving its comments directory, which tends to
|
|
> jumble the order. (And --gettime does not help, as ikiwiki does not
|
|
> tell git to follow renames for speed reasons.)
|
|
>
|
|
> I wonder if it wouldn't be best to just get rid of the extra date
|
|
> inside the comment, and rely on the file date as is done for other pages.
|
|
> Thoughts [[smcv]]?
|
|
>
|
|
> Altenatively, since comments tend to be named "comment_N_.....",
|
|
> adding a new [[pagespec/sorting]] method that sorts by filename,
|
|
> rather than by title, and using it by default for comments might be
|
|
> better than the current situation. --[[Joey]]
|