58 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
I would love to see more traditional support for comments in ikiwiki. One
|
|
way would be to structure data on the discussion page in such a way that a
|
|
"comment" plugin could parse it and yet the discussion page would still be
|
|
a valid and usable wiki page.
|
|
|
|
For example if the discussion page looked like this:
|
|
|
|
# Subject of First Comment
|
|
Posted by [Adam Shand](http://adam.shand.net/) at 10:34PM on 14/04/2007
|
|
|
|
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Morbi consectetuer nunc quis
|
|
magna. Etiam non est eget sapien vulputate varius. Vivamus magna. Sed justo. Donec
|
|
pellentesque ultrices urna.
|
|
|
|
# Subject of the Second Comment
|
|
Posted by [Foo Bar](http://foobar.net/) at 11:41PM on 14/04/2007
|
|
|
|
Quisque lacinia, lorem eget ornare facilisis, enim eros iaculis felis, id volutpat nibh
|
|
mauris ut felis. Vestibulum risus nibh, adipiscing volutpat, volutpat et, lacinia ut,
|
|
pede. Maecenas dolor. Vivamus feugiat volutpat ligula.
|
|
|
|
Each header marks the start of a new comment and the line immediately
|
|
following is the comments meta data (author, email/url, datestamp).
|
|
Hopefully you could structure it in such a way that the scope
|
|
|
|
This would allow:
|
|
|
|
* A comment plugin to render the comments in "traditional blog" format .
|
|
* Possibly even support nesting comments by the header level?
|
|
* A comment plugin to create a form at the bottom of the page for people to add comments in the appropriate format to the discussion page
|
|
* Still remain usable and readable by people who work via svn.
|
|
* When there is ACL support you could mark the discussion page as read only so it could only be updated by the comment plugin (if that's what you wanted)
|
|
|
|
Is this simple enough to be sensible?
|
|
|
|
-- [[AdamShand]]
|
|
|
|
> Well, if it's going to look like a blog, why not store the data the same
|
|
> way ikiwiki stores blogs, with a separate page per comment? As already
|
|
> suggested in [[discussion_page_as_blog]] though there are some things to
|
|
> be worked out also discussed there.
|
|
> --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
>> I certainly won't be fussy about how it gets implemented, I was just trying to think of the lightest weight most "wiki" solution. :-) -- Adam.
|
|
|
|
>>> As a side note, the feature described above (having a form not to add a page but to expand it in a formated way) would be useful for other things when the content is short (timetracking, sub-todo list items, etc..) --[[hb]]
|
|
|
|
I've been looking into this. I'd like to implement a "blogcomments"
|
|
plugin. Looking at the code, I think the way to go is to have a
|
|
formbuilder_setup hook that uses a different template instead of the
|
|
standard editpage one. That template would not display the editcontent
|
|
field. The problem that I'm running into is that I need to append the new
|
|
content to the old one.
|
|
|
|
-- [[MarceloMagallon]]
|
|
|
|
> Anything I can do to help? --[[Joey]]
|