99 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
99 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
How about adding ACL? So that you can control which users are allowed
|
|
to read, write certain pages. The moinmoin wiki has that, and it is
|
|
something, that I think is very valuable.
|
|
|
|
> ikiwiki currently has only the most rudimentary access controls: pages
|
|
> can be locked, or unlocked and only the admin can edit locked pages. That
|
|
> could certianly be expanded on, although it's not an area that I have an
|
|
> overwhelming desire to work on myself right now. Patches appreciated and
|
|
> I'll be happy to point you in the right directions.. --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
>> I'm really curious how you'd suggest implementing ACLs on reading a page.
|
|
>> It seems to me the only way you could do it is .htaccess DenyAll or something,
|
|
>> and then route all page views through ikiwiki.cgi. Am I missing something?
|
|
>> --[[Ethan]]
|
|
|
|
>>> Or you could just use apache or whatever and set up the access controls
|
|
>>> there. Of course, that wouldn't integrate very well with the wiki,
|
|
>>> unless perhaps you decided to use http basic authentication and the
|
|
>>> httpauth plugin for ikiwiki that integrates with that.. --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
>>>> Which would rule out openid, or other fun forms of auth. And routing all access
|
|
>>>> through the CGI sort of defeats the purpose of ikiwiki. --[[Ethan]]
|
|
|
|
>>>>> I think what Joey is suggesting is to use apache ACLs in conjunction
|
|
>>>>> with basic HTTP auth to control read access, and ikiwiki can use the
|
|
>>>>> information via the httpauth plugin for other ACLs (write, admin). But
|
|
>>>>> yes, that would rule out non-httpauth mechanisms. -- [[Jon]]
|
|
|
|
Also see [[!debbug 443346]].
|
|
|
|
> Just a few quick thoughts about this:
|
|
>
|
|
>* I'm only thinking about write ACLs. As Joey noted, read ACLs need to be done in the web server.
|
|
>* ACLs are going to be really hard for people with direct access to the revision control system.
|
|
> Which means that we really only need to define ACLs for web access.
|
|
>* ACLs for web access can then be defined by the web master. These might not need to be
|
|
> defined in the wiki pages (although they could be).
|
|
>* Given the previous two points, can't this be done with the `match_user()`
|
|
> function defined by the [[plugins/attachment]] plugin (see the [[ikiwiki/pagespec/attachment]] pagespec info)
|
|
> and the [[plugins/lockedit]] plugin?
|
|
>
|
|
> For example, add the following to your config file:
|
|
>
|
|
> locked_pages => '!(user(john) and */Discussion) and *',
|
|
>
|
|
> would lock all pages unless you're john and editing a Discussion page.
|
|
> It's a thought anyway :-). -- [[Will]]
|
|
|
|
>> Yes, writing per-user commit ACLs has become somewhat easier with recent
|
|
>> features. Breaking `match_user` out of attachment, and making the
|
|
>> lockedit plugin pass`user` and `ip` params when it calls `pagespec_match`
|
|
>> would be sufficient. And [[done]], configurable via
|
|
>> [[plugin/lockedit]]'s `locked_pages`. --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
I am considering giving this a try, implementing it as a module.
|
|
Here is how I see it:
|
|
|
|
* a new preprocessor directive allows to define ACL entries providing permissions
|
|
for a given (user, page, operation), as in:
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
\[[!acl user=joe page=*.png allow=upload]]
|
|
\[[!acl user=bob page=/blog/bob/* allow=*]]
|
|
\[[!acl user=* page=/blog/bob/* deny=*]]
|
|
\[[!acl user=http://jeremie.koenig.myopenid.com/ page=/todo/* deny=create
|
|
reason="spends his time writing todo items instead of source code"]]
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
Each would expand to a description of the resulting rule.
|
|
|
|
* a configurable page of the wiki would be used as an ACL list.
|
|
Possibly could refer to other ACL pages, as in:
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
\[[!acl user=* page=/subsite/* acl=/subsite/acl.mdwn]]
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
Any idea when this is going to be finished? If you want, I am happy to beta test.
|
|
|
|
> It's already done, though that is sorta hidden in the above. :-)
|
|
> Example of use to only allow two users to edit the tipjar page:
|
|
> locked_pages => 'tipjar and !(user(joey) or user(bob))',
|
|
> --[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
> > Thank you for the hint but I am being still confused (read: dense)... What I am trying to do is this:
|
|
|
|
> > * No anonymous access.
|
|
> > * Logged in users can edit and create pages.
|
|
> > * Users can set who can edit their pages.
|
|
> > * Some pages are only viewable by admins.
|
|
|
|
> > Is it possible? If so how?...
|
|
|
|
>>> I don't believe this is currently possible. What is missing is the concept
|
|
>>> of page 'ownership'. -- [[Jon]]
|
|
|
|
>>>> GAH! That is really a shame... Any chance of adding that? No, I do not really expect it to be added, after all my requirements are pushing the boundary of what a wikiwiki
|
|
should be. Nonetheless, thanks for your help!
|