Left out confirmation of removal for held attachments because
a) they're not in the wiki yet, so confirmation is a bit unnecessary
b) it would be hard
c) eases later integration of jquery file upload interface
Also changed where attachments of index are held (to match where they're
stored in the srcdir).
Note that the attachment formbuilder hook was made to run last, so that
the list of attachments is not generated before removal, in the fast path
w/o confirm.
Note that it's possible for an attachment in the holding area to be older
than an attachemnt in the wiki with the same name. I intentionally
show the one in the holding area in this (unlikely) case, since saving the
page will overwrite the wiki's file with the held attachment. It does not
seem worth the bother of doing something more intelligent, since in this
case two people have basically conflicted with one-another.. and both
attachment contents will be stored in revision control in case it needs to
be sorted out.
I had to remove the hyperlink for attachments in the holding area, since
they're not yet live on the web. This could be annoying/confusing. Added
a moseover notice instead.
This makes uploading a lot of attachments somewhat faster, because
the user does not need to wait for a long website refresh after each
upload. Still probably somewhat slow, since ikiwiki has to run for each
upload.
More importantly, this opens the door for integration of things like
the jquery file upload interface, which allow drag-n-drop and multiple
file uploads to be queued and then ran.
It uses rcs_commit_staged, which leaves out tla and mercurual which lack
that, but since rename, remove, autoindex, etc also use that, I think it's
fine for attachments to also depend on it.
The attachment list is currently broken; it does not look in the holding
area yet, and its links to the attached files won't work since they're not
yet in the wiki. previewing is also currently broken.
Work sponsored by TOVA.
Two problems fixed:
1. Files are written with a .ikiwiki-new suffix, which has to be taken into
account.
2. Need to count length of bytes, not of unicode characters.
Joey Hess
http://jmtd.livejournal.com/
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnxp2XU8gIribhhGhGuYtU6eMMwHv5gUGI
http://cdombroski.myopenid.com/
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawko7YtFjsEK_d2RYWu7Bbd7svypodeTLkc
http://profjim.myopenid.com/
simonraven
http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/
http://docwhat.org/
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnZ0g2UAijV7RGrKtWPljCCAYHBJ3pwPvM
http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/