This reverts commit 2f96c49bd1.
I forgot about internal pages. We don't want * matching them!
I left the optimisation in pagecount, where it used to live.
Internal pages probably don't matter when they're just being
counted.
I forgot to check if it was called from preprocess, and it is
not; it's called by a format hook. If an error is thrown from
a format hook, wiki build fails, so we don't want that.
* pagespec_match_list: New API function, matches pages in a list
and throws an error if the pagespec is bad.
* inline, brokenlinks, calendar, linkmap, map, orphans, pagecount,
pagestate, postsparkline: Display a handy error message if the pagespec
is erronious.
* Add IkiWiki::ErrorReason objects, and modify pagespecs to return
them in cases where they fail to match due to a configuration or syntax
error.
* inline: Display a handy error message if the inline cannot display any
pages due to such an error.
This is perhaps somewhat incomplete, as other users of pagespecs do not
display the error, and will eventually need similar modifications to inline.
I should probably factor out a pagespec_match_all function and make it throw
ErrorReasons.
The munged ids were looking pretty nasty, and were not completly guaranteed
to be unique. So a md5sum seems like a better approach. (Would have used
sha1, but md5 is in perl core.)
Well, that was a PITA.
Luckily, this doesn't break guids to comments in rss feeds,
though it does change the links.
I haven't put in a warning about needing to rebuild to get
this fix. It's probably good enough for new comments to get the
fix, without a lot of mass rebuilding.
It would be better to use urlto() here, but will_render
has not yet been called on the feed files at this point, so
it won't work. (And reorganizing so it can be is tricky.)
I guess what's happening here is that since the name
is passed to git via an environment variable, perl's normal
utf-8 IO layer stuff doesn't work. So we have to explicitly
decode the string from perl's internal representation into
utf-8.
This makes wikis such as zack's much faster in the scan pass.
In that pass, when a template contains an inline, there is no reason to
process the entire inline and all its pages. I'd forgotten to pass
along the flag to let preprocess() know it was in scan mode, leading to
much unncessary churning.
- In 3.05, ikiwiki began expanding templates in scan mode,
for annoying, expensive, but ultimatly necessary reasons
of correctness.
- Smiley processing has a bug: It inserts a span for the smiley,
and then continues searching forward in the content for more,
starting at $end_of_smiley+1. Which means it searches for smilies
in the span too! And if it somehow finds one, we get an infinite loop
here.
- This bug can, probably, only be tickled if a htmllink to
show the smiley fails, because the smiley file doesn't exist,
or because ikiwiki doesn't know about it. In that case,
a link will be inserted to _create_ the missing page,
and that link will include the smiley inside the <a></a>.
- When a template is expanded in scan mode, and it contains
an inline, the sanitize hook is run during scan mode,
which never happened before. That causes the smiley processor
to run, before ikiwiki is, necessarily, aware that all
the smiley files exist (depending on scan order). So
it inserts creation links for them, and triggers the bug.
I've put in the simple fix of jumping forward past the inserted
span, and it does fix the problem. I will need to look in a bit
more detail into why an inline nested inside a template is
fully expanded during the scan pass -- that really shouldn't
be necessary, and it makes things much slower than they need
to be.
This means that the underlay needs to have a wmd/wmd/wmd.js,
which is a trifle weird, but it isolates all the wmd stuff in a
single wmd subdirectory of the built wiki. The wmd/images creating
a toplevel images directory was particularly bad.
This is likely a misconfiguration and can cause login to fail as the
browser refuses the send the session cookie back over http.
Not entirely happy with putting the check where I did, since users have to
try to log in, and fail, to see the misconfiguration explained. But I could
not find a better place to put the check.
Joey Hess
chrysn