good idea
parent
98ad266119
commit
f9dc2bf859
|
@ -1,13 +1,19 @@
|
|||
[[!tag wishlist]]
|
||||
|
||||
Ikiwiki is static, so access control for viewing the wiki must be implemented on the web server side. Managing wiki users and access together, we can currently
|
||||
Ikiwiki is static, so access control for viewing the wiki must be
|
||||
implemented on the web server side. Managing wiki users and access
|
||||
together, we can currently
|
||||
|
||||
* use [[httpauth|plugins/httpauth/]], but some [[passwordauth|plugins/passwordauth]] functionnality [[is missing|todo/httpauth_feature_parity_with_passwordauth/]];
|
||||
* use [[passwordauth|plugins/passwordauth]] plus [[an Apache `mod_perl` authentication mechanism|plugins/passwordauth/discussion/]], but this is Apache-centric and enabling `mod_perl` just for auth seems overkill.
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, when ikiwiki is just a part of a wider web project, we may want to use the same userdb for the other parts of this project.
|
||||
Moreover, when ikiwiki is just a part of a wider web project, we may want
|
||||
to use the same userdb for the other parts of this project.
|
||||
|
||||
I think an ikiwiki plugin which would (re)generate an htpasswd version of the user/passwd base (better, two htpasswd files, one with only the wiki admins and one with everyone) each time an user is added or modified would solve this problem:
|
||||
I think an ikiwiki plugin which would (re)generate an htpasswd version of
|
||||
the user/passwd base (better, two htpasswd files, one with only the wiki
|
||||
admins and one with everyone) each time an user is added or modified would
|
||||
solve this problem:
|
||||
|
||||
* access control can be managed from the web server
|
||||
* user management is handled by the passwordauth plugin
|
||||
|
@ -15,3 +21,9 @@ I think an ikiwiki plugin which would (re)generate an htpasswd version of the us
|
|||
* htpasswd files can be mirrored on other machines when the web site is distributed
|
||||
|
||||
-- [[nil]]
|
||||
|
||||
> I think this is a good idea. Although unless the password hashes that
|
||||
> are stored in the userdb are compatible with htpasswd hashes,
|
||||
> the htpasswd hashes will need to be stored in the userdb too. Then
|
||||
> any userdb change can just regenerate the htpasswd file, dumping out
|
||||
> the right kind of hashes. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue