diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
index 990d39a93..8b36f1e59 100644
--- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so
 >> I thought about this briefly, and got about that far.. glad you got
 >> further. :-) --[[Joey]]
 
->> Or, one [[!taglink could also refer|pagespec_in_DL_style]] to the language of [[!wikipedia description logics]]: their formulas actually define classes of objects through quantified relations to other classes. --Ivan Z.
+>> Or, one [[!taglink could_also_refer|pagespec_in_DL_style]] to the language of [[!wikipedia description logics]]: their formulas actually define classes of objects through quantified relations to other classes. --Ivan Z.
 > 
 > Another option would be go with a more functional syntax.  The concept here would
 > be to allow a pagespec to appear in a 'pagespec function' anywhere a page can.  e.g.
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so
 
 >> So, equivilant example: `define(bugs, bugs/* and !*/Discussion) and define(openbugs, bugs and !link(done)) and openbugs and !link(openbugs)`
 >> 
+
 >> Re recursion, it is avoided.. but building a pagespec that is O(N^X) where N is the
 >> number of pages in the wiki is not avoided. Probably need to add DOS prevention.
 >>  --[[Joey]]