responses in halfhearted defense of provider in questions
parent
a6185778eb
commit
eb9f7bcc7f
|
@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ like mine will blacklist it.
|
||||||
> but malicious script authors will have no such qualms, so I would
|
> but malicious script authors will have no such qualms, so I would
|
||||||
> argue that your provider's strategy is already doomed... --[[smcv]]
|
> argue that your provider's strategy is already doomed... --[[smcv]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> I agree, and I'll ask them to fix it (and probably refer them to this page).
|
||||||
|
>> One reason they still have my business is that their customer service has
|
||||||
|
>> been notably good; I always get a response from a human on the first try,
|
||||||
|
>> and on the first or second try from a human who understands what I'm saying
|
||||||
|
>> and is able to fix it. I've dealt with organizations not like that....
|
||||||
|
>>
|
||||||
|
>> But I included the note here because I'm sure if _they're_ doing it, there's
|
||||||
|
>> probably some nonzero number of other hosting providers where it's also
|
||||||
|
>> happening, so a person setting up OpenID and being baffled by this failure
|
||||||
|
>> needs to know to check for it. Also, while the world of user-agent strings
|
||||||
|
>> can't have anything but relatively luckier and unluckier choices, maybe
|
||||||
|
>> `libwww/perl` is an especially unlucky one?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Error: OpenID failure: naive_verify_failed_network: Could not contact ID provider to verify response.
|
## Error: OpenID failure: naive_verify_failed_network: Could not contact ID provider to verify response.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Again, this could have various causes. It was helpful to bump the debug level
|
Again, this could have various causes. It was helpful to bump the debug level
|
||||||
|
@ -165,6 +178,12 @@ Then a recent `Net::SSLeay` perl module needs to be built and linked against it.
|
||||||
> but equally it might be as bad as it seems at first glance.
|
> but equally it might be as bad as it seems at first glance.
|
||||||
> "Let the buyer beware", I think... --[[smcv]]
|
> "Let the buyer beware", I think... --[[smcv]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> As far as I can tell, this particular provider _is_ on Red Hat (EL 5).
|
||||||
|
>> I can't conclusively tell because I'm in what appears to be a CloudLinux container when I'm in,
|
||||||
|
>> and certain parts of the environment (like `rpm`) I can't see. But everything
|
||||||
|
>> I _can_ see is like several RHEL5 boxen I know and love.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Local OpenSSL installation will need certs to trust
|
### Local OpenSSL installation will need certs to trust
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Bear in mind that the OpenSSL distribution doesn't come with a collection
|
Bear in mind that the OpenSSL distribution doesn't come with a collection
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue