Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.ikiwiki.info/srv/git/ikiwiki.info

doc/bugs/attachment:_failed_to_get_filehandle.mdwn

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+I can't add any attachment to my wiki. When I select file using "Browse"
+button and click "Upload Attachment", then `ikiwiki.cgi` file displays
+the error message like below:
+
+    Błąd: failed to get filehandle
+
+The same message I can see in the Apache log file. There is also
+following warning:
+
+    Use of uninitialized value in length at /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/attachment.pm line 36.
+
+Is it Ikiwiki bug or my attachment plugin is misconfigured? --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
+> Joey, please fix the colon in page name of my report. Ikiwiki sets
+> "attachment:\_failed\_to\_get\_filehandle/" URL on "Bugs" page and
+> the report is not clickable in my Epiphany browser:
+
+>     Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because the protocol
+>     (attachment) isn't associated with any program.
+
+> I can only edit it :) Bad handling ':' character by Ikiwiki is probably
+> its another bug.
+> --[[Paweł|ptecza]]

doc/bugs/attachment_plugin_enabled_by_default__63__.mdwn

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ that it's enabled by default in Ikiwiki. Is it true?
 > No, typo. I don't want to enable it by default because it requires
 > site-specific configuration to be made secure. --[[Joey]]
 
+>> Thanks for your reply! I was guessing it :) --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
 I have backported Ikiwiki 2.52 and I need to add that plugin to
 `add_plugins` variable in my `ikiwiki.setup` file (and rebuild
 my wiki, of course) to see new upload buttons when I edit a page
@@ -11,5 +13,7 @@ and click "Attachments" link.
 
 > FWIW, you don't need to rebuild the whole wiki, --refresh --wrappers is enough.
 
+>> It's good to know. Thank you for the hint! 
+
 Maybe should I enable attachment handling in different way?
 --[[Paweł|users/ptecza]]

doc/todo/conditional_text_based_on_ikiwiki_features.mdwn

@@ -119,3 +119,10 @@ to add to [[ikiwiki/Markdown]] something like
 > page for multimarkdown is a path to madness or unreadability though.
 > Perhaps it would be better to have .mmdwn files that can only contain
 > multimarkdown? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Really, there was only one (or maybe two) pages I had in mind as appropriate
+>> places for conditional text based on multimarkdown—the underlay pages
+>> for 'markdown' and maybe also 'formatting', because those are the pages you
+>> look at when you're trying to find out how to mark stuff up for the wiki, so
+>> if MM is enabled, they need to at least mention it and have a link to the
+>> MM syntax guide.--ChapmanFlack