doc/po(self-links): follow-ups

Signed-off-by: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
master
intrigeri 2009-08-27 20:38:36 +02:00
parent 6bc3206af1
commit eaa782a185
1 changed files with 14 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -265,9 +265,20 @@ good reason for that to be done? --[[Joey]]
> The commit 0113c69d4fb in my po branch might fix this. --[[intrigeri]] > The commit 0113c69d4fb in my po branch might fix this. --[[intrigeri]]
>> It may fix it in passing, but shouldn't it also be fixed for the other >> It may fix it in passing, but shouldn't it also be fixed for the other
>> `po_link_to` styles? (Also, if `mybestlink` is going to always >> `po_link_to` styles?
>> just return `bestlink` in this case, there seems no reason to inject
>> it.) --[[Joey]] >>> Other `po_link_to` styles already work ok: say there is
>>> a \[[dest]] link on a page called `dest`. When rendering
>>> `dest.LL`, `mybestlink` returns `dest.LL`, and `htmllink` is then
>>> able to detect, and manage correctly, that it is a self-link.
>>> --[[intrigeri]]
>> (Also, if `mybestlink` is going to always just return `bestlink` in
>> this case, there seems no reason to inject it.) --[[Joey]]
>>> Right. Commit cdc3576c8d1efb2 in my po branch prevents
>>> `mybestlink` to be injected when `po_link_to` is
>>> `default`. --[[intrigeri]]
Language display order Language display order
---------------------- ----------------------