sajolida 2011-07-14 05:06:12 -04:00 committed by admin
parent 928d7d240d
commit e8b6a70c3f
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ While working on our forum I was surprised to see that some of the comments were
> I'm seeing some comments in the rss feed. The feed is limited to the 25 > I'm seeing some comments in the rss feed. The feed is limited to the 25
> most recent items, you can increase that with feedshow. --[[Joey]] > most recent items, you can increase that with feedshow. --[[Joey]]
>> Of course, but in the feed, some of the new comments don't show up.
>> Most does but not all. For example, none of the comments of this thread
>> appears in the RSS, even though they should according to the « 25 most
>> recent items » criteria:
>> <https://tails.boum.org/forum/Security_Updates:_apt-get_Sufficient__63__/>
Then I found out that a map directive such as `!map pages="forum/* or Then I found out that a map directive such as `!map pages="forum/* or
comment(forum/*)"` was bringing a weird result too. The output is a map comment(forum/*)"` was bringing a weird result too. The output is a map
with quite a few broken links. with quite a few broken links.
@ -11,6 +17,9 @@ with quite a few broken links.
> internal page with a [[ikiwiki/WikiLink]] -- you'd get a broken link > internal page with a [[ikiwiki/WikiLink]] -- you'd get a broken link
> or a create link because these are not true wiki pages. --[[Joey]] > or a create link because these are not true wiki pages. --[[Joey]]
>> So I don't understand why 90 % of the comments are linked well and 10 %
>> are broken links. Why does this map behave differently for only a few comments?
Plus, some broken links in the map do match the comments missing on the RSS feed but some others do not. Plus, some broken links in the map do match the comments missing on the RSS feed but some others do not.
Unfortunately, I couldn't find an obvious pattern for this failure. Unfortunately, I couldn't find an obvious pattern for this failure.