urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

another look at bootstrap and packaging strategies

master
https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat 2016-11-01 11:45:31 -04:00 committed by admin
parent 7d48b885c9
commit e7cd4ac40b
1 changed files with 32 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
doc/todo/merge_bootstrap_branch.mdwn
View File

@ -29,3 +29,35 @@ except when the bootstrap theme is enabled.
>> [See for yourself](https://notabug.org/iikb/ikiwiki-theme-bootstrap/commit/7f30630b6255336a34b14f70f2a674e15cd797a0) - don't mind the red parts.
>> This is tedious and boring, it's easier to tamper with template files
>> than to rewrite bootstrap by copying and pasting it. --[[desci]]
> Is there any progress here? Someone wanting to build a Bootstrap 4
> should look at working with this branch or a custom theme?
>
> For the record, there is a Debian package for
> [font-awesome][]. [mkdocs-bootstrap][] uses
> that. [sphinx-bootstrap-theme][] is another bootstrap-based theme
> packaged in Debian. Both ship embeded copies of Bootstrap 3, so
> there are prior offenses to just shipping the code within the
> package.
>
> It would be preferable to package bootstrap 4 seperately of
> course... I made a [RFP for packaging B4](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842828).
>
> I was somehow under the impression that Boostrap 4 was lighter, but
> looking at the actual code on the alpha site makes me think that it
> is actually larger, which reduces the incentives for me to do the
> upgrade... Along with jquery, it's a 100KB overhead on first load,
> something that shouldn't be neglected. The [alpha site][] is around
> 1MB and 25 requests! My site can currently squeeze all of jquery and
> boostrap in 80KB (including the glyphs font) and it's only that
> stupid Mozilla Fira font that makes it blow up to 300KB... So I am
> not sure I would switch to B4 - maybe doing a B3 merge would be best
> for now, especially since Bootstrap 3 is already packaged in Debian?
> -- [[anarcat]]
[alpha site]: https://v4-alpha.getbootstrap.com
[bug #704330]: https://bugs.debian.org/704330
[orphaned]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/twitter-bootstrap
[sphinx-bootstrap-theme]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sphinx-bootstrap-theme
[mkdocs-bootstrap]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mkdocs-bootstrap
[font-awesome]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fonts-font-awesome