urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

response

master
Joey Hess 2010-04-02 22:23:36 -04:00
parent 5445fe7657
commit e4e53d7a18
1 changed files with 7 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
doc/todo/matching_different_kinds_of_links.mdwn
View File

@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ Some code refers to `oldtypedlinks`, and other to `oldlinktypes`. --[[Joey]]
> Oops, I'll fix that. That must mean missing test coverage, too :-( > Oops, I'll fix that. That must mean missing test coverage, too :-(
> --s > --s
>> A test suite for the dependency resolver *would* be nice. --[[Joey]]
I'm curious what your reasoning was for adding a new variable I'm curious what your reasoning was for adding a new variable
rather than using `pagestate`. Was it only because you needed rather than using `pagestate`. Was it only because you needed
the `old` version to detect change, or was there other complexity? the `old` version to detect change, or was there other complexity?
@ -133,6 +135,8 @@ with a empty type. (Bloaty.)) --J
> not counting tags and other typed links?". A typed link is > not counting tags and other typed links?". A typed link is
> still a link, in my mind at least. --s > still a link, in my mind at least. --s
>> Me neither, let's not worry about it. --[[Joey]]
I suspect we could get away without having `tagged_is_strict` I suspect we could get away without having `tagged_is_strict`
without too much transitional trouble. --[[Joey]] without too much transitional trouble. --[[Joey]]
@ -149,3 +153,6 @@ to set that link type, and its own pagespec function to match it.
I wonder whether to make a `typedlink` plugin that has the typedlink I wonder whether to make a `typedlink` plugin that has the typedlink
pagespec match function and a new `\[[!typedlink to="foo" type="bar"]]` pagespec match function and a new `\[[!typedlink to="foo" type="bar"]]`
though... --[[smcv]] though... --[[smcv]]
> I agree, per-type matchers are more friendly and I'm not enamored of the
> multi-parameter pagespec syntax. --[[Joey]]