master
intrigeri 2010-08-02 03:23:30 +02:00
parent 7a1d5632b8
commit e083e4caa8
2 changed files with 14 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ TODO
[[!inline pages="todo/po:* and !todo/done and !link(todo/done) and !todo/*/*" [[!inline pages="todo/po:* and !todo/done and !link(todo/done) and !todo/*/*"
feeds=no actions=no archive=yes show=0]] feeds=no actions=no archive=yes show=0]]
l10n wiki misconfiguration broken links to translatable basewiki pages that lack po files
-------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
If a page is not translated yet, the "translated" version of it If a page is not translated yet, the "translated" version of it
displays wikilinks to other, existing (but not yet translated?) displays wikilinks to other, existing (but not yet translated?)
@ -306,3 +306,12 @@ underlay, and the underlays lack translation to a given language.
>>>>> There is no complete Swedish underlay translation yet, so it is not >>>>> There is no complete Swedish underlay translation yet, so it is not
>>>>> shipped in ikiwiki. I don't think it's a misconfiguration to use >>>>> shipped in ikiwiki. I don't think it's a misconfiguration to use
>>>>> a language that doesn't have translated underlays. --[[Joey]] >>>>> a language that doesn't have translated underlays. --[[Joey]]
>>>>>> Ok. The problem is triggered when using a language that doesn't
>>>>>> have translated underlays, *and* defining
>>>>>> `po_translatable_pages` in a way that renders the base wiki
>>>>>> pages translatable in po's view of things, which in turns makes
>>>>>> the po plugin act as if the translation pages did exist,
>>>>>> although they do not in this case. I still need to have a deep
>>>>>> look at the underlays-related code you added to `po.pm` a while
>>>>>> ago. Stay tuned. --[[intrigeri]]

View File

@ -38,3 +38,6 @@ Re the meta title escaping issue worked around by `change`.
>>>>> in scan mode. Hmm, I wonder if there's any reason to have >>>>> in scan mode. Hmm, I wonder if there's any reason to have
>>>>> the scan hook called before those as it does now. Reordering >>>>> the scan hook called before those as it does now. Reordering
>>>>> those 2 lines could avoid adding a new hook. --[[Joey]] >>>>> those 2 lines could avoid adding a new hook. --[[Joey]]
>>>>>> Sure. I was fearing to break other plugins if I did so, so I
>>>>>> did not dare to. I'll try this. --[[intrigeri]]