Critical of automatic merging of stylesheets

master
kjs 2015-05-14 08:14:37 -04:00 committed by admin
parent 71ddaa5adb
commit dd1dceef47
1 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -157,3 +157,25 @@ this without that feature initially.
>>> >>>
>>> As you pointed out, CSS inclusion is more painful than it should be, and >>> As you pointed out, CSS inclusion is more painful than it should be, and
>>> your proposal seems to answer that. Go ahead! --[[Louis|spalax]] >>> your proposal seems to answer that. Go ahead! --[[Louis|spalax]]
> Concatenating the theme css as is done now results in files that are
> unecessarily large with a doubling of a lot of selectors etc. It only makes
> sense for changes that should be local.css anyway. Catted css is inefficient
> both while downloading and while rendering. I've disabled the catting in the
> makefile to avoid this on my personal site. In my view it would be better for
> theme developers to work from the basewiki style, if lazy just add their
> changes to the end of it, or if speed is of secondary importance @import it.
>
> The advanced melding of stylesheets discussed sounds quite complicated with
> likely useability problems when the site don't quite look as expected. Hunting
> down the problematic css will be difficult.
>
> Are there parsers that remove double defined selectors according to cascading
> rules as is done in browser? This would at least produce cleaner css but the
> useability problems would remain.
>
> When using complete themes and hunting that last bit of speed a config option
> to turn off local.css would probably be a good idea? Plugin css is difficult.
> A choice between a plugin complete theme or a local.css (or @import from it)
> would be a simple solution that lets you choose how you prioritize speed
> vs convenience. --[[kjs]]