urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

web commit by tuomov: Explanation etc.

master
joey 2007-02-20 08:32:10 +00:00
parent 1a25ceca3a
commit dbc503e779
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
doc/patchqueue/index.html_allowed.mdwn
View File

@ -274,6 +274,12 @@ I'll attach an updated and slightly modified version below.
>> Can someone elaborate on this? What's broken about it? Will pages >> Can someone elaborate on this? What's broken about it? Will pages
>> foo/index/index.html include foo/index in their parentlinks? --Ethan >> foo/index/index.html include foo/index in their parentlinks? --Ethan
>>> Presently the patch does not move `foo/index.type` as `foo/index/index.html`, but renders
>>> it as `foo/index.html`, not because I particularly want that (except for the top-level one, of
>>> course), but because it could be done :). This, however, conflicts with a `foo.mdwn`
>>> rendered as `foo/index.html`. The easiest and cleanest way to do this, is to simply
>>> not handle `index` in such a special manner -- except for the top-level one. --[[tuomov]]
* This does make the resulting wikis much less browsable directly on the * This does make the resulting wikis much less browsable directly on the
filesystem, since `dir` to `dir/index.html` conversion is only handled by web filesystem, since `dir` to `dir/index.html` conversion is only handled by web
servers and so you end up browsing to a directory index all the time. servers and so you end up browsing to a directory index all the time.
@ -290,6 +296,12 @@ I'll attach an updated and slightly modified version below.
>> index.html yet another option. I'm not _that_ fond of optioons >> index.html yet another option. I'm not _that_ fond of optioons
>> however. --[[Joey]] >> however. --[[Joey]]
>>> It is worth noting, that with this patch, you _can_ render the local
>>> copy in the present manner, while rendering the Web copy under
>>> directories. So no extra options are really needed for local browsing,
>>> unless you also want to serve the same copy over the Web, which I
>>> doubt. --[[tuomov]]
* Some of the generated links are missing the trailing / , which is * Some of the generated links are missing the trailing / , which is
innefficient since it leads to a http redirect when clicking on that innefficient since it leads to a http redirect when clicking on that
link. Seems to be limited to ".." links, and possibly only to link. Seems to be limited to ".." links, and possibly only to