comments
parent
b849c63ce3
commit
d72603534e
|
@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
|
||||||
The <a href="http://www.salmon-protocol.org/home">Salmon protocol</a> provides for aggregating comments across sites. If a site that syndicates a feed receives a comment on an item in that feed, it can re-post the comment to the original source.
|
The <a href="http://www.salmon-protocol.org/home">Salmon protocol</a>
|
||||||
|
provides for aggregating comments across sites. If a site that syndicates
|
||||||
|
a feed receives a comment on an item in that feed, it can re-post the
|
||||||
|
comment to the original source.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Ikiwiki does not allow comments to be posted on items it aggregates.
|
||||||
|
> So salmon protocol support would only need to handle the comment
|
||||||
|
> receiving side of the protocol.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> The current draft protocol document confuses me when it starts talking
|
||||||
|
> about using OAuth in the abuse prevention section, since their example
|
||||||
|
> does not show use of OAuth, and it's not at all clear to me where the
|
||||||
|
> OAuth relationship between aggregator and original source is supposed
|
||||||
|
> to come from.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> Their security model, which goes on to include Webfinger,
|
||||||
|
> thirdparty validation services, XRD, and Magic Signatures, looks sorta
|
||||||
|
> like they kept throwing technology, at it, hoping something will stick. :-P
|
||||||
|
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[!tag wishlist]]
|
[[!tag wishlist]]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue