this is meant to work like Jon expected it would
parent
7d2d0768a3
commit
d5a3335e15
|
@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ The presentation of the resulting comments is not sorted by this date, which I w
|
|||
> (eg, default of when the file was first seen) is used. The comment
|
||||
> date only affects the date displayed.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > That's not what I intended - it's meant to be more or less just
|
||||
> > syntactic sugar for `\[[!meta date=foo]]`, setting the `%pagectime`.
|
||||
> > The code looks as though it ought to work, but perhaps it's buggy?
|
||||
> > --[[smcv]]
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The only time I've seen this be much problem personally is when moving
|
||||
> a page, which means moving its comments directory, which tends to
|
||||
> jumble the order. (And --gettime does not help, as ikiwiki does not
|
||||
|
@ -34,3 +39,10 @@ The presentation of the resulting comments is not sorted by this date, which I w
|
|||
>>
|
||||
>> In my current situation, I could live with by-filename ordering. By-title
|
||||
>> ordering would also be workable. — [[Jon]]
|
||||
|
||||
>>> I agree with Jon's reasons for embedding an explicit date in the file.
|
||||
>>> As I said, this is *meant* to work, but it might not.
|
||||
>>>
|
||||
>>> Sorting by filename would only be useful with
|
||||
>>> [[!cpan Sort::Naturally]], since normal `cmp` ordering would break pages
|
||||
>>> with more than 9 comments. --s
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue