response
parent
66eb48ebcd
commit
d4ac1c750e
|
@ -20,3 +20,23 @@ there that isn't backed by the RCS and that will break IkiWiki's great abilities
|
||||||
distributed wiki.
|
distributed wiki.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[Will]]
|
[[Will]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Well, if you look at state that already persists across rebuilds, we have
|
||||||
|
> pagectime, which can be extracted from RCS only very slowly in many
|
||||||
|
> cases. There's also the separate state stored by the aggregate plugin,
|
||||||
|
> which is indeed independant of the RCS, and can in some cases not be
|
||||||
|
> replecated by rebuilding a different checkout (if the data is gone from
|
||||||
|
> the feeds). Then there's the session cookie database, and the user
|
||||||
|
> database, which started out with a lot of local state, has been
|
||||||
|
> whittled down by removing admin prefs and subscriptions, but still has
|
||||||
|
> important state including password hashes.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> So while I take your point about the potential for abuse,
|
||||||
|
> there's certianly legitimate reasons to need to store data across
|
||||||
|
> rebuilds. And plugins have always been able to drop their own files in
|
||||||
|
> wikistatedir as aggregate does and have it persist, so the abuse
|
||||||
|
> potential has always been there, the barrier has been lowered only
|
||||||
|
> slightly.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> OTOH, if something can be added to the documentation that encourages
|
||||||
|
> good behavior, that'd be a good thing ... --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue