From d23ecdea299ddfc5ff12c76dc619bb2b1557d16b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 
 "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlRjjrKEyPmXnh2qBEGx9PgH5DP32wCMAQ"
 <Jonathon@web>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:59:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: figured it out

---
 ...mment_2_80296d67c7f1dd75b56b85c14f5efa3b._comment | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Error:_CGI::tmpFileName_failed_to_return_the_uploaded_file_name/comment_2_80296d67c7f1dd75b56b85c14f5efa3b._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/Error:_CGI::tmpFileName_failed_to_return_the_uploaded_file_name/comment_2_80296d67c7f1dd75b56b85c14f5efa3b._comment b/doc/forum/Error:_CGI::tmpFileName_failed_to_return_the_uploaded_file_name/comment_2_80296d67c7f1dd75b56b85c14f5efa3b._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e7659413e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Error:_CGI::tmpFileName_failed_to_return_the_uploaded_file_name/comment_2_80296d67c7f1dd75b56b85c14f5efa3b._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlRjjrKEyPmXnh2qBEGx9PgH5DP32wCMAQ"
+ nickname="Jonathon"
+ subject="figured it out"
+ date="2013-01-19T15:59:09Z"
+ content="""
+It looks like this was just another expression of [the header size limit issue] [1] that has already been reported and addressed.
+
+I got `3.20120629` from `squeeze-backports`, and my issue has been resolved.
+
+[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638009
+"""]]