urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

response and removed old stuff

master
joey 2006-12-29 04:35:12 +00:00
parent 6fed9b48d5
commit d05d052bff
1 changed files with 4 additions and 33 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

35
doc/index/discussion.mdwn
View File

@ -188,38 +188,6 @@ Moved to [[bugs]] -- [[Joey]]
---- ----
# Textile Plugin
It was trivial, but I put together a plugin that uses the Textile markup
language, which I find to be the most superior of the various options for
that sort of thing. Where or how do I submit it for inclusion?
> You can post it to [[plugins/contrib]]. --[[Joey]]
>> Thanks. I tried using the "Add new post" form there, but apparently made a [mess of things somehow](http://ikiwiki.kitenet.net/contrib/textile___40__third-party_plugin__41__.html). Sorry about that.
>>> No problem, the contrib form had the wrong rootpage setting. I've fixed
>>> it up and moved it to the right place. A copyright statement would be
>>> nice.
> How does one go about making a markup language added by means of a plugin, the default markup language. In other words, I would like the index page to be written in Textile.
> If I include a index.txtl (where txtl is the extension I have assigned to be handled by the textile plugin), ikiwiki will ignore it and make a new index.mdwn.
>> Sounds like a bug; it should be configurable via `default_pageext`, but
>> I suspect that currently if there are two competing files with different
>> extensions that make the same page, they fight it out and some random
>> one "wins"
>>
>> Until I fix that, you can avoid the one from the underlay directory by
>> setting `underlaydir` to point to an empty directory. --[[Joey]]
>>
>> Ok, fixed (in svn), it will now prefer files in the srcdir over files
>> in the underlaydir that build the same page, no matter what extension.
>>> Thanks, Joey, much appreciated. --[Mazirian](http://mazirian.com)
----
# Access Keys # Access Keys
Would anyone else find this a valuable addition. In oddmuse and instiki (the only other Would anyone else find this a valuable addition. In oddmuse and instiki (the only other
@ -228,6 +196,9 @@ accesskey attribute. I find it nice not to have to resort to the mouse for thos
actions. However, it may not be something everyone appreciates. Any thoughts? actions. However, it may not be something everyone appreciates. Any thoughts?
--[Mazirian](http://mazirian.com) --[Mazirian](http://mazirian.com)
> Maybe, although it would need to take the critisism at
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/forms/accesskey.html into account.
---- ----
# Editing the style sheet. # Editing the style sheet.