From ca80578d4a015379ed6e505ca10417a12384c4e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:17:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] simplify bug report

---
 doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work.mdwn  |  8 +++++++-
 .../backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test1.mdwn | 10 ----------
 .../backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test2.mdwn |  1 -
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test1.mdwn
 delete mode 100644 doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test2.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work.mdwn b/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work.mdwn
index 6ec53d504..ede1d2fe3 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 It seems `backlink(.)` doesn't work, that is, it doesn't match pages linked
 to from the current page.
 
-[[!inline pages=test1 raw=true]]
+If I have two test pages, `foo`, which links to `bar`, then (on the `foo`
+page):
+
+ * backlink(foo) lists 'bar'
+ * backlink(.) lists nothing
+
+tested with 3.20120109.
 
 — [[Jon]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test1.mdwn b/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test1.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 52e1da969..000000000
--- a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test1.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-test1 links to [[test2]].
-
-`backlink(test1)`:
-
-[[!map pages="backlink(bugs/backlink(.) doesn't work/test1)"]]
-
-`backlink(.)`:
-
-[[!map pages="backlink(.)"]]
-
diff --git a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test2.mdwn b/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test2.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index a8b76dea9..000000000
--- a/doc/bugs/backlink__40__.__41___doesn__39__t_work/test2.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-test2!