rename hook: fixed half, added proposal for the other half

Signed-off-by: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
master
intrigeri 2009-01-27 17:22:38 +01:00
parent 5dd67723c1
commit c8ce3ed440
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -80,3 +80,18 @@ rename hashes it wants to add. Or, if the ability to modify existing
hashes is desired, it could return the full set of hashes.
--[[Joey]]
> I fixed the last part, i.e. a rename hook function now returns the
> full set of hashes. As I also converted it to take named parameters,
> such a function still is passed a reference to the original array,
> though, because one can't build a hash containing an array of hashes
> as a value, without passing this array as a reference.
>
> I'm not entirely sure about your first concern. Calling the hook
> before or after the subpages addition both have their own problems.
>
> What about running the hook before *and* after the subpages
> addition, with an additional `when` named parameter, so that
> a given hook function can choose to act only before or after, or both?
>
> --[[intrigeri]]