rename hook: fixed half, added proposal for the other half

Signed-off-by: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
master
intrigeri 2009-01-27 17:22:38 +01:00
parent 5dd67723c1
commit c8ce3ed440
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -80,3 +80,18 @@ rename hashes it wants to add. Or, if the ability to modify existing
hashes is desired, it could return the full set of hashes. hashes is desired, it could return the full set of hashes.
--[[Joey]] --[[Joey]]
> I fixed the last part, i.e. a rename hook function now returns the
> full set of hashes. As I also converted it to take named parameters,
> such a function still is passed a reference to the original array,
> though, because one can't build a hash containing an array of hashes
> as a value, without passing this array as a reference.
>
> I'm not entirely sure about your first concern. Calling the hook
> before or after the subpages addition both have their own problems.
>
> What about running the hook before *and* after the subpages
> addition, with an additional `when` named parameter, so that
> a given hook function can choose to act only before or after, or both?
>
> --[[intrigeri]]