urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

response

master
joey 2007-01-28 01:11:21 +00:00
parent 178cd7664c
commit bea093d3fc
1 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
View File

@ -103,7 +103,17 @@ by Ikiwiki.
This approach might be applicable to other distributed VCSs as well, although they're not as oriented
towards transmitting changes with standalone patch bundles (often by email) as darcs is.
> The mercurial plugin seems to just use one repo and edit it directly - is there some reason that's okay there but not for darcs? I agree with tuomov that having just the one repo would be preferable; the point of a dvcs is that there's no difference between one repo and another. I've got a darcs.pm based on mercurial.pm, that's almost usable... --bma
> The mercurial plugin seems to just use one repo and edit it directly - is
> there some reason that's okay there but not for darcs? I agree with tuomov
> that having just the one repo would be preferable; the point of a dvcs is
> that there's no difference between one repo and another. I've got a
> darcs.pm based on mercurial.pm, that's almost usable... --bma
>> IMHO it comes down to whatever works well for a given RCS. Seems like
>> the darcs approach _could_ be done with most any distributed system, but
>> it might be overkill for some (or all?) While there is the incomplete darcs
>> plugin in the [[patchqueue]], if you submit one that's complete, I will
>> probably accept it into ikiwiki.. --[[Joey]]
## [[Git]]