would you accept patches for this?
parent
204e733d79
commit
bccea01c07
|
@ -75,3 +75,20 @@ I find CSS3 support still spotty... Here are some notes on how to do this in Ik
|
|||
> [[rel_attribute|rel_attribute_for_links]] now that CSS can use.)
|
||||
>
|
||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> I had a little look at this, last weekend. I added a class definition to
|
||||
>> the `htmllink` call in `linkify` in `link.pm`. It works pretty well, but
|
||||
>> I'd also need to adjust other `htmllink` calls (map, inline, etc.). I found
|
||||
>> other methods (CSS3 selectors, etc.) to be unreliable.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> Would you potentially accept a patch that added `class="internal"` to
|
||||
>> various `htmllink` calls in ikiwiki?
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> How configurable do you think this behaviour should be? I'm considering a
|
||||
>> config switch to enable or disable this behaviour, or possibly a
|
||||
>> configurable list of class names to append for internal links (defaulting
|
||||
>> to an empty list for backwards compatibility)>
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> As an alternative to patching the uses of `htmllink`, what do you think
|
||||
>> about patching `htmllink` itself? Are there circumstances where it might be
|
||||
>> used to generate a non-internal link? -- [[Jon]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue