another issue
parent
3d8f0b1a3f
commit
b94b0b564d
|
@ -369,6 +369,17 @@ daring a timid "please pull"... or rather, please review again :)
|
||||||
> * Is there any real reason not to allow removing a translation?
|
> * Is there any real reason not to allow removing a translation?
|
||||||
> I'm imagining a spammy translation, which an admin might not
|
> I'm imagining a spammy translation, which an admin might not
|
||||||
> be able to fix, but could remove.
|
> be able to fix, but could remove.
|
||||||
|
> * Re the meta title escaping issue worked around by `change`.
|
||||||
|
> I suppose this does not only affect meta, but other things
|
||||||
|
> at scan time too. Also, handling it only on rebuild feels
|
||||||
|
> suspicious -- a refresh could involve changes to multiple
|
||||||
|
> pages and trigger the same problem, I think. Also, exposing
|
||||||
|
> this rebuild to the user seems really ugly, not confidence inducing.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> So I wonder if there's a better way. Such as making po, at scan time,
|
||||||
|
> re-run the scan hooks, passing them modified content (either converted
|
||||||
|
> from po to mdwn or with the escaped stuff cheaply de-escaped). (Of
|
||||||
|
> course the scan hook would need to avoid calling itself!)
|
||||||
>
|
>
|
||||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
>>
|
>>
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue