redesigning recentchanges
parent
b11ddb88e6
commit
b810552073
|
@ -86,3 +86,60 @@ your pages. --Ethan
|
|||
> backend.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> -- CharlesMauch
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Here's a full design for redoing recentchanges, based on Ethan's ideas:
|
||||
|
||||
* Add a recentchanges plugin that has a preprocessor directive:
|
||||
\[[recentchanges num=100 pages=* template=recentchanges.tmpl]]
|
||||
If put on the [[recentchanges]] page, this would result in up to 100
|
||||
recentchanges/change_$id.mdwn files being created.
|
||||
* Which means the plugin has to store state and use a checkconfig hook
|
||||
or the like to create the requested pages (and delete old ones) when
|
||||
the wiki is rebuilt and when the post_commit hook is run.
|
||||
* Then it's a simple matter of using inline on the recentchanges page
|
||||
to display the changes. (With a special template to display nicely.)
|
||||
* Rss/atom comes for free..
|
||||
* So drop mail notifications.
|
||||
* If someone wants to subscribe to notifications for only a subset
|
||||
of pages, they can either filter the recentchanges in their rss
|
||||
aggregator, or they can set up their own page that uses the recentchanges
|
||||
directive for only the pages they want.
|
||||
* The `rcs_notify` functions will be removed.
|
||||
* `rcs_getchange` is passed a change id (as returned from rcs_recentchanges)
|
||||
and a partially filled out HTML::Template and fills out the remainer of the
|
||||
template. So if a template is used that includes diffs, it will need to run
|
||||
some expensive diffing operation, wikis with less resources can use a
|
||||
template that doesn't include diffs and avoid that overhead.
|
||||
* So to update the changes files, just call `rcs_recentchanges`, create
|
||||
files for each new id, and delete files for each id that is no longer
|
||||
included.
|
||||
* The cgi support for recentchanges can be dropped, or moved to a different
|
||||
plugin.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm unsure how fast this will all be, but by using regular pages, there's
|
||||
cacheing, at least. The main slowdown might turn out to be the inlining and
|
||||
not the generation of the changes pages. The current cgi recentchanges
|
||||
code saves a tenth of a second or so by memoizing htmllink, an optimisation
|
||||
that won't be available when using the more general inlining code.
|
||||
|
||||
An obvious optimisation, and one implied by this design, is that each change
|
||||
file is only written once. This assumes that the data in them doesn't ever
|
||||
change, which actually isn't true (svn commit messages can be changed), but
|
||||
is probably close enough to true for our purposes.
|
||||
|
||||
Another optimisation would be to htmlize the change files when they're
|
||||
written out -- avoids re-rendering a given file each time a new change is
|
||||
made (thus doing 1/100th the work).
|
||||
|
||||
Links in the change files to the changed pages will need special handling.
|
||||
These links should not generate backlinks. They probably shouldn't be
|
||||
implemented as wikiliks at all. Instead, they should be raw, absolute
|
||||
html links to the pages that were changed.
|
||||
|
||||
Only problem with this approach is that the links break if the changed
|
||||
page later gets deleted. I think that's acceptable. It could link to
|
||||
`ikiwiki.cgi?do=redir&page=foo`, but that's probably overkill.
|
||||
|
||||
--[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue