respond re pubdate attribute
parent
00da4678c8
commit
af0679aa77
|
@ -13,8 +13,16 @@ The pubdate REQUIRES a date, so e.g. `pubdate="2009-03-24T18:02:14Z"`
|
||||||
>>>
|
>>>
|
||||||
>>> Posted <time datetime="2007-12-06T05:00:00Z" pubdate="pubdate">Thu 06 Dec 2007 12:00:00 AM EST</time>
|
>>> Posted <time datetime="2007-12-06T05:00:00Z" pubdate="pubdate">Thu 06 Dec 2007 12:00:00 AM EST</time>
|
||||||
>>>
|
>>>
|
||||||
>>> which shows up as an error on https://validator.w3.org/ --Luke Schierer
|
>>> which shows up as an error on https://validator.w3.org/ --Luke Schierer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>>> My reading of Joey's response, above, was that (according to the spec at the time), `pubdate="pubdate"` is what
|
||||||
|
>>>> should be generated, *not* `pubdate="timestamp"`, and so what you are seeing is expected. However, looking at
|
||||||
|
>>>> the *current* Spec (linked elsewhere in this page), `pubdate` is not actually a valid attribute any more at
|
||||||
|
>>>> all. And indeed, running my own blog through the Validator, I see:
|
||||||
|
>>>>> `Error: Attribute pubdate not allowed on element time at this point.`
|
||||||
|
>>>> *— [[Jon]], 2020-10-05*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Otherwise the XML parser chokes.
|
Otherwise the XML parser chokes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue