urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

responses

master
joey 2007-04-22 23:59:05 +00:00
parent 3d8c1a36b2
commit acfc0452a5
1 changed files with 22 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn
View File

@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
I would love to see more traditional support for comments in ikiwiki. One way would be to structure data on the discussion page in such a way that a "comment" plugin could parse it and yet the discussion page would still be a valid and usable wiki page.
I would love to see more traditional support for comments in ikiwiki. One
way would be to structure data on the discussion page in such a way that a
"comment" plugin could parse it and yet the discussion page would still be
a valid and usable wiki page.
For example if the discussion page looked like this:
@ -16,7 +19,9 @@ For example if the discussion page looked like this:
mauris ut felis. Vestibulum risus nibh, adipiscing volutpat, volutpat et, lacinia ut,
pede. Maecenas dolor. Vivamus feugiat volutpat ligula.
Each header marks the start of a new comment and the line immediately following is the comments meta data (author, email/url, datestamp). Hopefully you could structure it in such a way that the scope
Each header marks the start of a new comment and the line immediately
following is the comments meta data (author, email/url, datestamp).
Hopefully you could structure it in such a way that the scope
This would allow:
@ -30,6 +35,19 @@ Is this simple enough to be sensible?
-- [[AdamShand]]
I've been looking into this. I'd like to implement a "blogcomments" plugin. Looking at the code, I think the way to go is to have a formbuilder_setup hook that uses a different template instead of the standard editpage one. That template would not display the editcontent field. The problem that I'm running into is that I need to append the new content to the old one.
> Well, if it's going to look like a blog, why not store the data the same
> way ikiwiki stores blogs, with a separate page per comment? As already
> suggested in [[discussion_page_as_blog]] though there are some things to
> be worked out also discussed there.
> --[[Joey]]
I've been looking into this. I'd like to implement a "blogcomments"
plugin. Looking at the code, I think the way to go is to have a
formbuilder_setup hook that uses a different template instead of the
standard editpage one. That template would not display the editcontent
field. The problem that I'm running into is that I need to append the new
content to the old one.
-- [[MarceloMagallon]]
> Anything I can do to help? --[[Joey]]