master
parent
6429c991f6
commit
a84b8faf74
|
@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ inconsistent between the one-and two-argument forms. Thoughts?
|
||||||
> I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked
|
> I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked
|
||||||
> all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out
|
> all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out
|
||||||
> as that would need. --[[Joey]]
|
> as that would need. --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/prune author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>> Try this, then? I had to make some changes to `attachment`
|
||||||
|
>> to make the split versions available. I suggest reviewing
|
||||||
|
>> patch-by-patch.
|
||||||
|
>>
|
||||||
|
>> I also tried to fix a related bug which I found while testing it:
|
||||||
|
>> the special case for renaming held attachments didn't seem to work.
|
||||||
|
>> (`smcv/wip/rename-held`.) Unfortunately, it seems that with that
|
||||||
|
>> change, the held attachment is committed to the `srcdir` when you
|
||||||
|
>> rename it, which doesn't seem to be the intention either? --[[smcv]]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue