http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ 2012-04-09 08:04:10 -04:00 committed by admin
parent 6429c991f6
commit a84b8faf74
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ inconsistent between the one-and two-argument forms. Thoughts?
> I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked > I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked
> all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out > all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out
> as that would need. --[[Joey]] > as that would need. --[[Joey]]
[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/prune author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"]]
>> Try this, then? I had to make some changes to `attachment`
>> to make the split versions available. I suggest reviewing
>> patch-by-patch.
>>
>> I also tried to fix a related bug which I found while testing it:
>> the special case for renaming held attachments didn't seem to work.
>> (`smcv/wip/rename-held`.) Unfortunately, it seems that with that
>> change, the held attachment is committed to the `srcdir` when you
>> rename it, which doesn't seem to be the intention either? --[[smcv]]