From 9f4c5d2466b71d6a80fc1af3c1d0367aafde3112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:59:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] new todo --- doc/todo/cache_backlinks.mdwn | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/cache_backlinks.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/cache_backlinks.mdwn b/doc/todo/cache_backlinks.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dc13d464e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/cache_backlinks.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +I'm thinking about caching the backlinks between runs. --[[Joey]] + +* It would save some time (spent resolving every single link + on every page, every run). The cached backlinks could be + updated by only updating backlinks from changed pages. + (Saved time is less than 1/10th of a second for docwiki.) + +* It may allow attacking [[bugs/bestlink_change_update_issue]], + since that seems to need a copy of the old backlinks. + Actually, just the next change will probably solve that: + +* It should allow removing the `%oldlink_targets`, `%backlinkchanged`, + and `%linkchangers` calculation code. Instead, just generate + a record of which pages' backlinks have changed when updating + the backlinks, and then rebuild those pages. + +Proposal: + +* Store a page's backlinks in the index, same as everything else. + +* Do *something* to generate or store the `%brokenlinks` data. + This is currently generated when calculating backlinks, and + is only used by the brokenlinks plugin. It's not the right + "shape" to be stored in the index, but could be changed around + to fit.