Tell `git revert` not to follow renames
Otherwise, we have an authorization bypass vulnerability: rcs_preprevert looks at what changed in the commit we are reverting, not at what would result from reverting it now. In particular, if some files were renamed since the commit we are reverting, a revert of changes that were within the designated subdirectory and allowed by check_canchange() might now affect files that are outside the designated subdirectory or disallowed by check_canchange(). Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>master
parent
7244b712c1
commit
9cada49ed6
|
@ -973,7 +973,9 @@ sub rcs_revert ($) {
|
|||
|
||||
ensure_committer();
|
||||
|
||||
if (run_or_non('git', 'revert', '--no-commit', $sha1)) {
|
||||
if (run_or_non('git', 'revert', '--strategy=recursive',
|
||||
'--strategy-option=no-renames',
|
||||
'--no-commit', $sha1)) {
|
||||
return undef;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,3 +16,10 @@ when reverting.
|
|||
> vulnerabilities (such as authorization bypass) by private email to the
|
||||
> maintainers, so that they are not visible to the general public
|
||||
> until we have had a chance to fix the bug. --[[smcv]]
|
||||
|
||||
> Fixed by using
|
||||
> `git revert --strategy=recursive --strategy-option=no-renames`.
|
||||
> I tried to do something more clever (doing the revert, and checking
|
||||
> whether it made changes that aren't allowed) but couldn't get it to
|
||||
> work in a reasonable time, so I'm going with the simpler fix.
|
||||
> [[Fix committed|done]], a release will follow later today. --[[smcv]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue