consistency with edittemplate?
parent
db64972b65
commit
9673806a6d
|
@ -8,4 +8,10 @@ I've written a new plugin, sectiontemplate, available in the `page_tmpl` branch
|
||||||
> Before I do though, would it perhaps make sense to merge
|
> Before I do though, would it perhaps make sense to merge
|
||||||
> this in with the pagetemplate plugin? They do such a similar thing,
|
> this in with the pagetemplate plugin? They do such a similar thing,
|
||||||
> and unless letting users control the template by editing a page is not
|
> and unless letting users control the template by editing a page is not
|
||||||
> wanted, I can't see any reason not to combine them. --[[Joey]]
|
> wanted, I can't see any reason not to combine them. --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> One other idea is moving the pagespec from setup file to a directive.
|
||||||
|
> The edittemplate plugin does that, and it might be nice
|
||||||
|
> to be consistent with that. To implement it, you'd have to
|
||||||
|
> make the scan hook store the template pagespecs in `%pagestate`,
|
||||||
|
> so a bit more complicated. --[[Joey]]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue