From 8eb3a06f1e21878a19fa634f3c6521f008659977 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: desci Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:24:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Arguing more --- doc/themes/discussion.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn index d8241a8e6..1c0dd91ec 100644 --- a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ links to the actual theme. -- [[anarcat]] >>> version of `page.tmpl` containing only the features you personally >>> need, but the `page.tmpl` in ikiwiki should be comprehensive. --[[smcv]] +>>>> I've tried to make the least changes possible in [this page.tmpl file](https://notabug.org/iikb/ikiwiki-theme-bootstrap/raw/master/templates/page.tmpl), but I couldn't overcome the suckness of bootstrap itself. +>>>> I am aware of alternatives to bootstrap, but it seems that every one of them would require some changes in the `page.tmpl` to work as expected. +>>>> I think it is realistic to have a bootstrap (or other superb, fantastic css frame*lazy*work) without a `page.tmpl`, +>>>> but I also think there should be other way around the chaos of each and every [[available theme|theme_market]] having it's own installing proccess. +>>>> Other argument I have is: could we have a theme-contrib, like the [[plugins]] have? This would require the mantainer to implement the new features in their themes. + --- I have a question.