urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge remote branch 'upstream/master' into prv/po

master
intrigeri 2010-08-23 09:36:22 +02:00
parent e85c15e75b 5de07f59be
commit 8c2962ec48
3 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
doc/bugs/Highlight_extension_uses_hard_coded_paths.mdwn 100644
View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
The [[plugins/highlight]] plugin hard codes some paths up the top of the plugin. This means that you need to edit the ikiwiki source if you have highlight installed in a non-standard location (e.g. if you have done a user-level install of the highlight package).

7
doc/forum/Can__39__t_get_comments_plugin_working.mdwn 100644
View File

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
I feel like I must be missing something.
My blog is based on Ikiwiki, and uses /yyyy/mm/dd/title/ for blog posts. Because I use the plugin that generates index pages for subdirectories, I have to use /????/??/??/* to identify posts and avoid missing the index pages for years, months and days.
I've enabled the comments plugin, but no matter what I do, I can't seem to make the comment form appear on my posts. I've removed the entire site and have rebuilt. I've set the pagespec to /????/??/??/* and ./????/??/??/*, but neither seems to work. I don't see any output, or anything else to indicate that pages aren't working.
Are there any other plugins that need to be enabled for this to work? I think I've locked things down such that anonymous users can't edit by enabling signinedit and setting a lock, but this may be blocking the ability to comment (though I don't recall seeing anything in the docs about needing additional plugins.)

2
doc/todo/edit_form:_no_fixed_size_for_textarea.mdwn
View File

@ -40,3 +40,5 @@ browsers emulate it. [[done]]
--[[Joey]]
Wouldn't it be possible to just implement an integer-valued setting for this, accessible via the "Setup" wiki page? This would require a wiki regen, but such a setting would not be changed frequently I suppose. Also, Mediawiki has this implemented as a per-user setting (two settings, actually, -- number of rows and columns of the edit area); such a per-user setting would be the best possible implementation, but I'm not sure if ikiwiki already supports per-user settings. Please consider implementing this as the current 20 rows is a great PITA for any non-trivial page.
> I don't think it would need a wiki rebuild, as the textarea is generated dynamically by the CGI when you perform a CGI action, and (as far as I know) is not cooked into any static content. -- [[Jon]]