urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

idea from josh

master
Joey Hess 2008-09-04 14:35:35 -04:00
parent c427ab7ccb
commit 83bb8f4fca
1 changed files with 57 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

57
doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn 100644
View File

@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
This is an idea from [[JoshTriplett]]. --[[Joey]]
Some uses of ikiwiki, such as for a BTS, move a bit away from the wiki end
of the spectrum, and toward storing structured data about a page or instead
of a page.
For example, in a bug report you might want to choose a severity from a
list, enter a version number, and have a bug submitter or owner recorded,
etc. When editing online, it would be nice if these were separate fields on
the form, rather than the data being edited in the big edit form.
There's a tension here between remaining a wiki with human-editable source
files, containing freeform markup, and more structured data storage. I
think that it would be best to include the structured data in the page,
using a directive. Something like:
part of page content
\[[data yaml="<arbitrary yaml here>"]]
rest of page content
As long as the position of the directive is not significant, it could be
stripped out when web editing, the yaml used to generate/populate form fields,
and then on save, the directive regenerated and inserted at top/bottom of
the page.
Josh thinks that yaml is probably a good choice, but the source could be a
`.yaml` file that contains no directives, and just yaml. An addition
complication in this scenario is, if the yaml included wiki page formatted content,
ikiwiki would have to guess or be told what markup language it used.
Either way, the yaml on the page would encode fields and their current content.
Information about data types would be encoded elsewhere, probably on a
parent page (using a separate directive). That way, all child pages could
be forced to have the same fields.
There would be some simple types like select, boolean, multiselect, string.
Probably lists of these (ie, list of strings). Possibly more complex data
structures.
It should also be possible for plugins to define new types, and the type
definitions should include validation of entered data, and how to prompt
the user for the data.
This seems conceptually straightforward, if possibly quite internally
complex to handle the more complicated types and validation.
One implementation wrinkle is how to build the html form. The editpage.tmpl
currently overrides the standard [[cpan CGI::FormBuilder]] generated form,
which was done to make the edit page be laid out in a nice way. This,
however, means that new fields cannot be easily added to it using
[[cpan CGI::FormBuilder]]. The attachment plugin uses the hack of bouilding
up html by hand and dumping it into the form via a template variable.
It would be nice if the type implementation code could just use
FormBuilder, since its automatic form generation, and nice field validation
model is a perfect match for structured data. But this problem with
editpage.tmpl would have to be sorted out to allow that.