Respond, and close bug
parent
69a814c011
commit
825366a007
|
@ -23,6 +23,27 @@ it on universally at this point might break a number of people's pagespecs. --
|
|||
> lists a page the same as linking to it. I don't think this is a bug.
|
||||
> --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
>> Fair enough. I guess we can mark this as [[done]] then.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> Just a bit of background on where I was going here... I was looking for
|
||||
>> a simpler way of attacking [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]].
|
||||
>> In particular, rather than introducing changes to the pagespec definition,
|
||||
>> I wondered if you could use wiki pages as the defined pagespec and
|
||||
>> introduce a 'match_mutual' function which matches whenever two pages
|
||||
>> link to the same third page, then you don't need to alter the pagespec
|
||||
>> handling code.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> But that requires being able use use a pagespec to decide what pages
|
||||
>> are linked to. e.g. I want to make an 'openbugs' page that links to all
|
||||
>> open bugs. Then I could make a 'readybugs' page that links to
|
||||
>> `backlink(openbugs) and !mutualLink(openbugs)`. That is, all bugs
|
||||
>> that are open and do not themselves link to an open bug.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> The problem with all this is that it introduces an ordering dependency,
|
||||
>> as I noted below. I think the original proposal is better, because it
|
||||
>> handles that ordering dependency in the definition of the pagespecs.
|
||||
>> --[[Will]]
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a patch to make map link to its linked pages (when passed `link="yes"`). It is a bit problematic in that it uses a pagespec
|
||||
to decide what to link to (which is why I wanted it). However, at the time the pagespec is used the links
|
||||
for each page haven't finished being calculated (we're using the pagespec to figure out those links,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue