response to review (thanks!)
parent
a9664b9df8
commit
782ad9f4c3
|
@ -236,24 +236,56 @@ I don't think ikiwiki offers a better way to do that, because there is
|
|||
normally no reason to do that. Why does it need an url of this form here?
|
||||
--[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> In all the popular, production-quality podcast feeds I've looked
|
||||
> at, enclosure URLs are always absolute (even when they could be
|
||||
> expressed concisely as relative). [Apple's
|
||||
> example](http://www.apple.com/itunes/podcasts/specs.html#example)
|
||||
> does too. So I told \[[!meta]] to call `urlto()` with the third
|
||||
> parameter true, which means the \[[!inline]] code here gets an
|
||||
> absolute URL in `$pagestate{$p}{meta}{enclosure}`. To compute the
|
||||
> enclosure's metadata, though, we of course need it as a local path.
|
||||
> I didn't see a less
|
||||
> [ongepotchket](http://www.jewish-languages.org/jewish-english-lexicon/words/1402)
|
||||
> way at the time. If you have a better idea, I'm happy to hear it;
|
||||
> if not, I'll add an explanatory comment. --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
||||
+<TMPL_IF HTML5><section id="inlineenclosure"><TMPL_ELSE><div id="inlineenclosure"></TMPL_IF>
|
||||
+<TMPL_IF ENCLOSURE>
|
||||
|
||||
Can't we avoid adding this div when there's no enclosure? --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> Sure, I've moved the `<TMPL_IF ENCLOSURE>` check to outside the
|
||||
> section-and-div block for `{,inline}page.tmpl`. --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
||||
+<a href="<TMPL_VAR ENCLOSURE>">Download this episode</a>
|
||||
|
||||
"Download this episode" is pretty specific to particular use cases.
|
||||
Can this be made more generic, perhaps just "Download"? --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> Yep, I got a little carried away. Done. --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
||||
-<TMPL_IF AUTHOR>
|
||||
- <title><TMPL_VAR AUTHOR ESCAPE=HTML>: <TMPL_VAR TITLE></title>
|
||||
- <dcterms:creator><TMPL_VAR AUTHOR ESCAPE=HTML></dcterms:creator>
|
||||
|
||||
This change removes the athor name from the title of the rss feed, which
|
||||
This change removes the author name from the title of the rss feed, which
|
||||
does not seem necessary for fancy podcasts. And it is a change that
|
||||
could negatively impact eg, Planet style aggregators using ikiwiki. --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> While comparing how feeds render in podcatchers, I noticed that
|
||||
> RSS and Atom were inconsistent in a couple ways, of which this was
|
||||
> one. The way I noticed it: with RSS, valuable title space was being
|
||||
> spent to display the author. I figured Atom's display was the one
|
||||
> worth matching. You're right, of course, that planets using the
|
||||
> default template and somehow relying on the current author-in-the-title
|
||||
> rendering for RSS feeds (but not Atom feeds!) would be broken by
|
||||
> this change. I'm having trouble imagining exactly what would break,
|
||||
> though, since guids and timestamps are unaffected. Would it suffice
|
||||
> to provide a note in the changelog warning people to be careful
|
||||
> upgrading their planets, and to customize `rssitem.tmpl` if they
|
||||
> really prefer the old behavior (or don't want to take any chances)?
|
||||
> --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
||||
+++ b/templates/rsspage.tmpl
|
||||
+ xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
|
||||
+<atom:link href="<TMPL_VAR FEEDURL>" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
|
||||
|
@ -263,6 +295,17 @@ every crummy rss reader on earth is going to understand this? I'd put it at
|
|||
about 0%; I doubt ikiwiki's own rss reader understands such a mashup.
|
||||
--[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> The validator I used (<http://validator.w3.org/>, I think) told me to.
|
||||
> Pretty sure it doesn't make anything work better in the podcatchers
|
||||
> I tried. Hadn't considered that it might break some readers.
|
||||
> Removed. --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
||||
+<generator>ikiwiki</generator>
|
||||
|
||||
Does this added tag provide any benefits? --[[Joey]]
|
||||
|
||||
> Consistency with the Atom feed, and of course it trumpets ikiwiki
|
||||
> to software and/or curious humans who inspect their feeds. The tag
|
||||
> arrived only in RSS 2.0, but that's already the version we're
|
||||
> claiming to be, and it's over a decade old. Seems much less risky
|
||||
> than the atom namespace bits. --[[schmonz]]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue