web commit by http://ethan.betacantrips.com/: virtual pages?
parent
3f7279e801
commit
76f3988510
|
@ -32,3 +32,36 @@
|
|||
>> I have more thoughts on this topic which I will probably write
|
||||
>> tomorrow. If you thought my other patches were blue-sky, wait until
|
||||
>> you see this. --Ethan
|
||||
|
||||
OK, so here's how I see the RecentChanges thing. I write blog posts and
|
||||
the inline plugin generates RSS feeds. Readers of RSS feeds are notified
|
||||
of new entries but not changes to old entries. I think it's rude to change
|
||||
something without telling your readers, so I'd like to address this.
|
||||
To tell the user that there have been changes, we can tell the user which
|
||||
page has been changed, the new text, the RCS comment relating to
|
||||
the change, and a diff of the actual changes. The new text probably isn't
|
||||
too useful (I have a very hard time rereading things for differences),
|
||||
so any modifications to inline to re-inline pages probably won't help,
|
||||
even if it were feasible (which I don't think it is). So instead we
|
||||
turn to creating diffs automatically and (maybe) inlining them.
|
||||
|
||||
I suggest that for every commit, a diff is created automagically
|
||||
but not committed to the RCS. The page containing this diff would be
|
||||
a "virtual page", which cannot be edited and is not committed.
|
||||
(Committing here would be bad, because then it would create a new
|
||||
commit, which would need a new diff, which would need to be committed,
|
||||
etc.) Virtual pages would "expire" and be deleted if they were not
|
||||
depended on in some way.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's say these pages are created in edits/commit_%d.mdwn. RecentChanges
|
||||
would then be a page which did nothing but inline the last 50 edits/*.
|
||||
This would give static generation and RSS/Atom feeds. The inline
|
||||
plugin could be optionally altered to inline pages from edits/*
|
||||
that match any pages in its pagespec, and through this we could get
|
||||
a recent-changes+pagespec thing.
|
||||
|
||||
You could make an argument that I care way too much about what amounts
|
||||
to edits anyhow, but like Josh says, there are use cases for this.
|
||||
While this could be done with mail subscriptions, I can think of sites
|
||||
where you might want to disable all auth so that people can't edit
|
||||
your pages. --Ethan
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue