urosm
/
ikiwiki
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

web commit by http://ethan.betacantrips.com/: respones

master
joey 2007-02-07 17:49:17 +00:00
parent 89b2c0cbcc
commit 5813066cdc
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn
View File

@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ I can see why it might not be much of an improvement. :) --Ethan
>>> Ah.. in that case, why not use "a/b/* and !a/b/*/*" ? No need for a new >>> Ah.. in that case, why not use "a/b/* and !a/b/*/*" ? No need for a new
>>> symbol. --[[Joey]] >>> symbol. --[[Joey]]
>>>> I know it's not necessary, but it would be helpful. --Ethan
OK, I took a shot at implementing the changes. I was thinking about making OK, I took a shot at implementing the changes. I was thinking about making
pagespecs relative by default but I couldn't decide whether page pagespecs relative by default but I couldn't decide whether page
`foo/bar` inlining `*` should match `foo/bar/*` or `foo/*`. `foo/bar` inlining `*` should match `foo/bar/*` or `foo/*`.
@ -114,6 +116,12 @@ and you can see it work at
>>> of deeply nested subdirs. >>> of deeply nested subdirs.
>>> --[[Joey]] >>> --[[Joey]]
>>>> Context-dependence was my conclusion too. My feeling is that inlining
>>>> in a subdirectory of the current page is more common, but I don't
>>>> really know. However, I think the changes as written should work OK
>>>> with my index patch and allowing inlining from a/b/c/, so I'm
>>>> satisfied. --Ethan
> I've committed support for ./ to ikiwiki now, based on your patch. > I've committed support for ./ to ikiwiki now, based on your patch.
> --[[Joey]] > --[[Joey]]