Some crude benchmarking on a larger wiki
parent
a3f4077c36
commit
54f94e6bc8
|
@ -62,7 +62,12 @@ equally valid.)
|
||||||
>>
|
>>
|
||||||
>> Performance impact: Test 2 above takes 0.2s longer to rebuild (probably
|
>> Performance impact: Test 2 above takes 0.2s longer to rebuild (probably
|
||||||
>> from all the calls to lc, which are, however, necessary for correctness)
|
>> from all the calls to lc, which are, however, necessary for correctness)
|
||||||
>> and has indistinguishable performance for a refresh. --[[smcv]]
|
>> and has indistinguishable performance for a refresh.
|
||||||
|
>>
|
||||||
|
>> Test 1 took about 6 minutes to rebuild and 1:25 to refresh; those are
|
||||||
|
>> pessimistic figures, since I've added 90 more photos and 90 more pages
|
||||||
|
>> (both to the wiki as a whole, and the number touched before refreshing)
|
||||||
|
>> since testing the previous version of this branch. --[[smcv]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> Also I think there may be little optimisation value left in
|
> Also I think there may be little optimisation value left in
|
||||||
> 7227c2debfeef94b35f7d81f42900aa01820caa3, since the "regular" dependency
|
> 7227c2debfeef94b35f7d81f42900aa01820caa3, since the "regular" dependency
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue